Is It Easy to Handle a Case In Small Claims Court?
The Small Claims Court Is a Genuine Court of Law As a Division of the Superior Court of Justice and Functions Far Differently Than What Is Observed By Watching Television Court Shows. The Small Claims Court Operates With a Unique Set of Procedural Rules. The Dispute Specific Substantive Law Is the Same As Applies In the Higher Court.
Understanding Why It Is the Small Claims Court Rather Than the Simple Cases Court Requires Appreciation of Legal Formality
A case in the Small Claims Court may involve legal issues that are just as complicated, and sometimes even more complicated, than a case in the higher court that handles matters above the $35,000 limit applicable to Small Claims Court (the limit of $35,000 became effective January 1 2020). Do note that court costs and legal representative costs, are exclusive from the $35,000 limit.
The Procedural Law
Similarly to legal disputes for amounts over the $35,000 limit of the Small Claims Court, as are litigated within the higher court, a Small Claims Court case involves a procedural set of rules that apply and govern the stages and steps within the process of how a legal matter is conducted. Additionally, the substantive law specific to the issues within the legal dispute also apply. For a Small Claims Court case, the Rules of the Small Claims Court set out the procedural law as, essentially, a how to manual for the requirements of conducting a Small Claims Court case. This procedural law prescribes the documents required as well as a general step-by-step outline for how a case moves from one stage to another stage.
Interestingly, although the Rules of the Small Claims Court are a set of rules, the rules are very flexible and may receive significant latitude by a judge of the Small Claims Court. Additionally, a judge in the Small Claims Court may make reference to the Rules of Civil Procedure, R.R.O. 1990, Regulation 194, where necessary. This flexibility in applying the Rules of the Small Claims Court was confirmed and explained by the Court of Appeal within the reasons for decision as stated in Kelava v. Spadacini, 2021 ONCA 428. Specifically, the Rules of the Small Claims Court and the reasons in Kelava state:
1.03 (1) These rules shall be liberally construed to secure the just, most expeditious and least expensive determination of every proceeding on its merits in accordance with section 25 of the Courts of Justice Act.
Matters Not Covered in Rules
(2) If these rules do not cover a matter adequately, the court may give directions and make any order that is just, and the practice shall be decided by analogy to these rules, by reference to the Courts of Justice Act and the Act governing the action and, if the court considers it appropriate, by reference to the Rules of Civil Procedure.
 The Small Claims Court is a branch of the Superior Court of Justice. It handles nearly half of the civil disputes in the province. The court is meant to provide an efficient, cost-effective forum for the resolution of civil disputes involving less than $35,000. It hears cases in a summary way and “may make such order as is considered just and agreeable to good conscience”: The Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43, s. 25.
 In short, the court embodies the foundations of access to justice: informality, affordability, timely resolution, accessibility for self-represented people and active judicial engagement. By providing access to justice, the court has an important role in the administration of justice for the province.
 The rules are to be read in their entire context having regard to their nature, purpose, scheme, and object. The Small Claims Court Rules, read in their entirety, emphasize facilitating access to justice. They begin with guidance as to their interpretation. Rule 1.03(1) provides:
These rules shall be liberally construed to secure the just, most expeditious and least expensive determination of every proceeding on its merits in accordance with section 25 of the Courts of Justice Act. O. Reg. 258/98, r. 1.03 (1). [Emphasis added]
 To further provide for the achievement of their objectives, the rules give broad discretion to the court. If the rules do not directly address a matter, the court may give directions and make “any order that is just”. In order to implement the order, the practice is to be decided by analogy to the Small Claims Court Rules. Then, “if the court considers it appropriate” the court may refer to the Rules of Civil Procedure. Rule 1.03(2) provides:
If these rules do not cover a matter adequately, the court may give directions and make any order that is just, and the practice shall be decided by analogy to these rules, by reference to the Courts of Justice Act and the Act governing the action and, if the court considers it appropriate, by reference to the Rules of Civil Procedure. O. Reg. 78/06, s. 3. [Emphasis added.]
For sources of further helpful information regarding the rules of procedure and forms applicable to the Small Claims Court, see:Learn More About
Rules of the Small Claims Court Learn More About
Forms of the Small Claims Court
Paladin LLPis an affordable Paralegal in:
Generally, the Rules of the Small Claims Court limit a costs award for reimbursement of legal fees paid to a qualified representative to fifteen (15%) percent...Learn More
The document disclosure processes of the Small Claims Court are often described as easy enough for a self-represented layperson without legal training;...Learn More
Although an inaccurate translation from the literal Latin, the principle of 'stare decisis' may be thought of as the starring precedent setting decision when a...Learn More
The pleading documents for a lawsuit should avoid references to any resolution terms discussed.Learn More
The law of issue estoppel relates to legal matters previously disputed and involves the res judicata principles which is Latin for things decided.Learn More
Generally, costs awards in Small Claims Court are limited to actual reimbursement for the expenses incurred for representation (lawyer, student-at-law, or...Learn More
The monetary jurisdiction of the Small Claims Court allows for each Plaintiff to bring claims up to the $35,000 limit; and accordingly, a Defendant may be...Learn More
The law, generally, permits reasonable name corrections as necessary. A correction is often made merely on Consent; however, if a party is unwilling to...Learn More
If a legal error is discovered after a court decision is rendered, generally, an Appeal is required. Only in very rare circumstances will a judge reconsider...Learn More
Significant debate among legal practitioners often arises as to whether the Small Claims Court holds jurisdiction for claims brought seeking equitable relief. ...Learn More
Documents containing scandalous statements that are irrelevant or potentially prejudicial without probative value to court proceedings should be struck from...Learn More